Fail
On 2009-06-07, Paul VanKoughnett <allisp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Paul VanKoughnett<allisp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz <zeckal...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett
>>> > <allisp...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
>>> >
>>> > Fails; no such proposal was ever in the Pool.
>>> >
>>>
>>> He meant "Very little or no lurk time" which was NttPF anyway.
>>>
>>> Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
>>
>>
>> WOW I fail.
>
> Proposal: Very little or no lurk time (II=1, AI=1)
> {
> Amend rule 1922, Defined Regular Patent Titles, by adding a new bullet
> to the end of the bulleted list reading:
> "(i) Leapt before Lookt, awarded to those individuals who attempted to
> emulate First Speaker Michael Norrish by registering as soon as
> possible after hearing about Agora."
>
> Award the Patent Title of Not A Lurker to Yally, Murphy, and Quazie.
> }
>

Reply via email to