On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:40 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > Geoffrey Spear wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM, > > C-walker<[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Ed Murphy<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> ============================== CFJ 2586 ============================== > >>> > >>> Myndzi is a player. > >> > >> I judge UNDETERMINED due to complete lack of evidence. This is clearly > >> not decidable based on the Caller's Evidence below, and as per CFJ > >> 1744 it is not my job to go finding the relevant evidence in the > >> archives. > > > > I intend with 2 support to appeal this judgment. The only relevant > > evidence was quoted in my initiation message, and all of the > > discussion concerning the case happened in the past day. It's not > > like delving deep into the archives is required. It's also definitely > > not in the best interests of the game to leave person's citizenship > > undetermined. > > Gratuitous: this is almost certainly FALSE. Myndzi is neither a natural > person nor a partnership, hence not a person and thus ineligible for > playerhood. In the unlikely event that Myndzi's response caused its > programmer to join a contract, "Myndzi" has never to my knowledge been > used as a name for said programmer, and must therefore refer only to the > bot.
Myndzi is (almost certainly) a first-class person (incidentally second on the current outside-Agora BF Joust leaderboard). Eir IRC client also contains a script, which talks using eir username on occasion. In this sense, it's not that different from Peekee's webform; Myndzi normally talks as emself, but sometimes it's the script, and the only real way to tell them apart is whether the response seems scripted and the timing. -- ais523
