Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > This is a public contract named the Charity Foundation. Parties to > this contract are known as Helpful. Intriguing. I've never seen a contract demonym that was an adjective rather than a noun.
> Departement to the Charity Foundation, if possible. Helpful players Department. > If, at the beginning of a quarter, the Charity Foundation owns any > assets, the Founder shall outline a Gift Plan of how those assets are > to be distributed. Assets should be given to the players (if any) who > have helped Agora significantly or players in great need. The Founder > can then, with Agoran consent among the Helpful, act on behalf of the > Charity Foundation to transfer assets from it as outlined by the Plan. > If consent is not reached, the Founder shall outline a new Gift Plan. Any Helpful player should be able to submit a Gift Plan, though the Founder is still required to do so quarterly. Voting on multiple Gift Plans should be possible in parallel (I think they are in the current wording). The last sentence quoted above should read "The Founder SHALL outline as many Gift Plans as necessary until consent is reached for one." This way, when e outlines a new one before the previous one actually fails, e isn't required to create a third Plan after the first fails. I was going to suggest that Gift Plan be renamed to something that doesn't share an acronym with Grand Poobah, but caste is going to be repealed soon anyway. > But is it a good idea? Yes.
