On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 09:37, ais523<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 02:45 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: >> We've been considering the Notary to be high-priority based upon >> custom, therefore you only receive weekly salary. > > That's almost certainly a bug, given that the monthly task is > considerably harder than the weekly one. (But ofc, only gaining monthly > salary would be considerably worse than only gaining weekly salary!) It > would almost make sense for offices to have weekly and monthly IIs, > which would be set to 0 if they had no duties for the stated timeframe. > What would make far more sense if you ask me is to eliminate the concept of report timeframe from salary. There is no need to have two different governing mechanisms (report timeframe and II) for paying salaries when one would suffice. Massage the II of a few offices, if needed increase the II upper range, and then pay weekly salary for all offices based on that II.
BobTHJ
