Re: DIS: Re: BUS: test

[Sean Hunt]

Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/8/10 Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com>:
>> It could be a contract-defined dependent action.
> 
> I'm fairly sure the courts disagree.
Funnily enough, the "as if it were a rule" clause helps here; a rule
must be explicit in the definition of a dependent action.