On 9/23/09 11:50 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> This judge's opinion is that such a Hard Deregistration is exercised
>> by the player ceasing to be involved in the Agoran forums and
>> essentially ignoring the game. When such occurs, R101 vii is fulfilled
>> as Agora makes no attempt to impose any penalty upon a absent player
>> other than to deregister them.
>
> I pledge: {
> This pledge is named Acid Test.
> Pavitra SHALL NOT deregister.
> Pavitra CAN terminate this pledge by announcement.
> }
>
> I CFJ, II-2: {
> If Pavitra were to deregister now, explicitly invoking eir
> R101(vii) right, the only appropriate judgement in a criminal
> CFJ against em for violating the Power-2 R1742 by violating
> Acid Test by deregistering would be GUILTY/DISCHARGE.
> }
Arguments:
R1742/18:
"... However, if a player is found GUILTY
of violating this rule by failing to act in accordance with
an Equitable contract, then the only appropriate sentence is
DISCHARGE, unless the failure pertains to a previously-imposed
equity judgement."
(Though I believe R101 prevents the judgment of GUILTY since it
proscribes anti-MAY-deregister interpretation of the pledge itself and
not just the rules.)
- woggle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
