On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:38, Charles Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Roger Hicks <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25, Charles Walker >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:18, Charles Walker >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> For each of the following proposals, I intend, without 3 objections, >>>>> to make it Distributable: >>>>> >>>>> Anarchy Anarchy >>>> >>>> I object >>>> >>>>> Abduct the Aliens >>>> >>>> I object >>>> >>>>> Invasion Alert Level Green >>>> >>>> I object >>>> >>>>> End of the Accountor >>>> >>>> I object >>> >>> I can understand some of these objections, but why are you against >>> repealing a Rule which has only an unused definition in it? >>> >> I thought it was a useful definition, even if it is currently unusued. > > How can something that isn't used possibly be useful? > Hey, no one said my reasoning had to be logical :)
BobTHJ
