On 01/14/2010 10:49 AM, ais523 wrote:
Valid point, I'm pretty convinced that ratification is broken, now. (Possibly by being too ambiguous to have an effect.) I still don't think the general concept of ratification is too weak to provide a mechanism around 1698; but the specific implementation we have at the moment may be.
My interpretation is that ratification falls under the principle of most action; ratification will do as much as it can. In the case of an Agoran Decision, it would resolve the Decision with the wrong outcome, but everything else would be changed as if it had had the right outcome.
-coppro
