On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > Not that interesting. If the two messages are exact endpoints of a 30-day > time period, then neither message is "within" the R869 30-day limit and > so registration is not prohibited. It might be more interesting if the > rule read "cannot register until 30 days have passed." "Within" to me > implies (t1,t2) while "have passed" could be (t1,t2]. -G.
I'm not sure about that at all. e.g. if I somehow simultaneously create the obligation to do something, and do it, I don't think it's clear at all whether I've satisfied the obligation. However, in the real world the message cannot be sent *exactly* 30 days later; it must be either before or after the deadline, but if the difference is subsecond, we don't know which. Thus a CFJ on whether Wooble is a player would be easily UNDETERMINED and e might be able to have some fun. -- -c.
