On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 14:18, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> It would be lovely if the caller actually, again, bothered to provide >> an argument if there was a legal question rather than just a finding >> of fact. Like the previous CFJ that caller Yally handed me, I should >> have returned Not Guilty due to lack of evidence provided by caller. >> I support the appeal, requesting a REMAND to consider the point of law. >> -G. >> > > Now wait a minute. I quoted all the relative rules as evidence when I called > the CFJ. I think it's unfair to accuse me thus when it doesn't even seem you > considered the evidence I provided to see whether or not coppro committed a > crime.
You're right. It was a drive-by opinion and drive-by followup (partly lack of sleep driven) on my part. I apologize, Yally, my comment was uncalled for. -G.
