On 04/14/2010 09:29 AM, comex wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Sean Hunt<[email protected]> wrote:- if at least two other players done so so e last did so, ors/done/have doneA player CAN, without objection from the Proposal's author, add a Fragment to a Defragmentation Proposal's Inode if, were the Proposal adopted, that Fragment's text would be added to the Ruleset.Maybe restrict this to proposals in the Pool.
Good catch
On an Agoran Decision to adopt a Defragmentation Proposal, the list of Fragments in the Proposal's Inode along with their authors is an essential parameter. The Promotor's report shall include the same information for each such Proposal in the report. When a Defragmentation Proposal is adopted, the author of the Proposal is awarded a Leadership Token. Additionally, each player who authored one or more Fragments in the Proposal's Inode is awarded Leadership Tokens equal to one third the number of such Fragments e authored, rounded up. Lastly, all Fragments cease to be Fragments.This puts the reward for contributing a fragment as high as that for authoring the whole (which is quite high in both cases-- 6 rests is a lot).
Hmm... good point. Probably the value of a Token should be scaled down. Bear in mind that an author can submit his own Fragment and get extra reward that way.
If a Fragment that is a member of a Defragmentation Proposal's Inode ceases to be a Fragment, it is still treated as one for the purpose of rules relating to that Proposal. For this reason, it is RECOMMENDED that the Granulator not restart the numbering of Fragments.Why allow this in the first place?
The first sentence is so that other Defragmentation Proposals (such as those resolved in the same batch) can still give their awards as they otherwise would even after the Fragments stop being Fragments. Probably this should only apply to distributed Defragmentation Proposals. The second sentence is actually unnecessary and will be removed.
-coppro
