On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Keba wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
> > > How about:
> > >
> > > Making a decision's voting period shorter than seven days is
> > > secured if the decision has at least two options.
> >
> > Buggy; "secured" only works against changes, specifically, so it would
> > allow a decision to be created with a short voting period.
> >
>
> A more direct attempt:
>
> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the voting period for a
> decision with at least two options cannot be shorter than seven
> days, except a Rule with a power of 3 or higher explicitly
> states so.
>
> Maybe "a power of 3" should be "a power higher or equal than the power
> of this Rule".
Other option. In R107, just say:
The voting period for a decision with at least two options cannot
be shorter than seven days.
(and in the Urgent Rule)
Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the voting period for an
urgent proposal is 5 days.
[This makes it so rules that would shorten the voting period have to
not just be power-3, but have to explicitly point out that they are
overriding R107).
-G.
