On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:47 -0400, omd wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:37 PM, ais523 <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:33 -0400, omd wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Believing the statement in question is obviously completely unreasonable > >> > [...] therefore the statement is true. > >> > >> what > > > > I can be an unreasonable person, sometimes. > > CFJ (inquiry): ais523 violated Rule 2215 in eir ruling on CFJ 2892, by > saying that "the statement is true" while simultaneously admitting it > is impossible to reasonably believe it is true.
I see no option but to take the Rest, if it turns out that such statements are illegal even in CFJ evidence. I think it's fairer to the Agoran community as a whole explain my reasoning and possibly take a penalty, than it is to just submit an unadorned TRUE. (A good thing that punishments are pretty much meaningless at the moment...) -- ais523
