On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, omd wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Judgement: > > R2230/15 reads: > > Knowingly issuing a NoV with incorrect information is ILLEGAL, > > and the Class-4 Crime of Libel. > > To be considered libel and illegal, you must know the information is > > false. Since the statement creates a paradox/undecidable loop, you > > can't know that the statement is false. FALSE. > > I transfer a prop from G. to ais523, because the former ignored the > arguments of the latter regarding Rule 2319. (although I think the > outcome is correct)
Apologies, I thought I was acknowledging eir 2319 argument that e would simultaneously violate and not violate as e argues, but that this is in fact what the "knowingly" clause defends against. I should have been more clear there. I'll support a motion to reconsider if anyone thinks it should be part of the case. Also, I don't think eir argument about "knowingly" works as it amounts to re-arranging the implied parentheses in an inappropriately silly and obviously unintended way. -G.
