On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 18:22, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 18:09 -0600, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 18:04, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> I assume Herald. >> > >> > Me too! >> >> Alright. I assume the office of Herald. I resign the office of Herald. >> I initiate an election to decide the holder of the Herald office. I >> nominate ais523 and Wooble as Herald. > > Wooble and I weren't arguing about the ownership of the office at all; > rather, we were both attempting the same timing scam (vs. someone > attempting to crown a new speaker). I have no reason to be Herald /now/. > See, one of the issues with no effective standing reward for an office > is that just anyone can assume it for the perks; I feel a little guilty > doing so, but I had Wooble's "permission", and I haven't stolen any > other office rewards. (Not to mention that it made no difference in the > long run anyway, as it happens.) > > -- > ais523
That's why I always try to keep the offices I hold Postulated.
