On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> 6997 2.0 omd Soles > > AGAINST (no effect)
It depends on Souls. >> 6998 3.0 omd Fix implicit votes > > AGAINST (don't pick an arbitrary constant; fix voting) I don't think it's broken. It's useful to allow voters to vote different ways on the same decision, so I wouldn't want "sum of voting limits of people who voted X"; banning voting limit changes would forbid a lot of fun stuff; and making it literally an infinite number of votes (and defining/regulating infinite actions) seems like overkill for this one feature; so what do you suggest? >> 7000 3.0 omd Souls > > AGAINST (I don't get it) If you transfer your Soul to a partnership, it can vote for you on ordinary decisions. Not all that interesting but less boilerplate than act-on-behalf.
