On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Elliott Hird
<penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 13 April 2011 06:20, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is there really enough ambiguity here for this CFJ to be warranted?
>> It seems more valid than most of my attempts.
>
> It's not *my* fault if someone registers in an uninteresting manner.

Proto: In R869, replace "reasonably clearly and reasonably
unambiguously" with "reasonably unclearly and reasonably ambiguously".

Reply via email to