On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > CFJ: In general, if a purported action by announcement is accompanied > by a disclaimer equivalent to "this may be ineffective", without > indicating why it may be ineffective, then the action is ineffective > due to ambiguity.
Well, this is almost identical to CFJ 1971, which ais523 cited in CFJ 2069. >> Incidentally, does anyone remember why none (not even the first 5) of >> my spam CFJs were added to the database? > > Assuming you mean the ones mentioned in CFJ 1774, No, I mean the ones from 2069, which were written out in full, albeit with a broad disclaimer.
