On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Note, even though the Appeals cases in practice cannot be assigned due
> to high numbers of justices needed, this does not violate a R101
> right to appeal a sentence.  The appeal was successfully initiated by
> the defendant, and (importantly) the punishment was suspended pending
> outcome.  So e is not being punished while the appeal remains pending;
> fixing this is Agora's problem, not the defendant's.

You're probably right, but you didn't address my argument about
Walker's right to resolve a controversy being violated.

Reply via email to