omd wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> No, because I appealed, and so the sentence was suspended. Then I >>> appealed again. Then the first appeals panel voted AFFIRM, so the >>> sentence was reapplied. If then second panel votes to affirm, it would >>> be applying a second sentence when only a single sentence was ever >>> suspended. >> >> No, it would be re-applying the first sentence; the "prior judgement" >> is assigned. Â There's always only one sentence per case as far as I can >> tell. > > The AFFIRM did not re-apply any sentence, since the question on > sentencing was inapplicable because the question on culpability did > not have a judgement once e appealed it. It had no effect.
Ah, I forgot about the 'applicable' part. I retract the two CFJs that I recently initiated.
