On Thu, 12 May 2011, omd wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Trying to remember; I know there was at least one case before where
> > the same action could be performed by announcement or dependently;
> > there was quite some discussion on whether if a dependent "attempt"
> > failed whether the by-announcement worked if the "announcement" cited
> > the intent. Anyone recall context?
>
> Note that nowadays any announcement action can be performed
> dependently using R2288.
I'm not sure that covers it. To do the dependent action, the person
must specify the exact method including N that e is using (R1728a).
The fact that if e can do it by announcement means e can do it w/o
objection (as per R2288 first paragraph) still means that the intent
has to match the actual method used if e tries to do it w/o objection.
And this part:
If a person CAN perform an action via multiple different means
of dependent actions, e CAN perform that action via multiple of
them at the same time.
doesn't help for "announcement" because announcement isn't a type of
dependent action.
So, I think that e can do it by announcement. BUT if e announces
"having received 0 objections, I do X" when e's really received an
objection, then it doesn't succeed by announcement, it fails the
w/o objection.
Maybe.
-G.
