On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:38 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:17 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: >> This amendment modifies two clauses; the unexpected one is this (sigh): >> >> An eligible voter on a particular Agoran decision submits a >> ballot to the vote collector by publishing a valid notice >> indicating which two of the available options e selects. > > Now that I think about it, the most sensible way to interpret this is > as a requirement for each ballot to specify both FOR and AGAINST-- > i.e., there's now no way to vote for a proposal without also voting > against it!
This would have also affected all the proposals coming after in that batch.
