On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:49 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > The two key sections of the disclaimer in CFJ 1971 are
I, umm, think I got a bit too carried away writing that disclaimer, and I'm not sure if it makes for a very good precedent as a result. (I think it contradicts itself several times, as well as the message it's in.) -- ais523
