On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Elliott Hird <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 21 June 2011 18:20, Pavitra <celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes. > > I'm aware; I'm questioning the value of a player being able to object > to their own deregistration due to long inactivity without becoming > active.
They could just register again and go on hold if they weren't allowed to object; there's no really good reason to stop someone who wants to be a player from continuing to be one even if there's no apparent reason why they'd want to be one.
