On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Elliott Hird <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 30 June 2011 23:50, Joshua Murphy <math...@ymail.com> wrote: >> People refer to some CFJs like they were rules, but they aren't >> really rules. If there isn't any particular reason for this, can we make >> them actual rules? > > It's a similar situation to common law.
Except that it's not, because in common law jurisdictions the rulings actually have legitimate power, while in Agora you're just allowed to possibly consider them in interpreting the rules.
