Walker wrote: > On 24 July 2011 19:11, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: >> The relevant announcements, in order: >> >> 1) Pavitra attempted (with the support of the other panelists) to >> directly cause the panel to judge AFFIRM with prejudice > > We still have Rule 2341, right?
Yes, it governs the opinion-based method of panel action, but also allows for other methods (such as R2157 paragraph 2).
