On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 18:08, Sean Hunt <scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:00, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I agree with scshunt's arguments. Destroying the points all at once is
> > permitted by the rules, even if it is a mistake in the rules. Trying to
> > catch him on some other issue that the courts already DISMISSED in order
> to
> > make-up for him cleverly circumventing the rules does not seem
> appropriate.
> > I opine OVERRULE/NOT GUILTY.
>
> I don't see how NOT GUILTY is appropriate. I clearly did violate the rule.
>
> -scshunt
>

But judgement was already reached on a similar case.

Reply via email to