On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 18:08, Sean Hunt <scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:00, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I agree with scshunt's arguments. Destroying the points all at once is > > permitted by the rules, even if it is a mistake in the rules. Trying to > > catch him on some other issue that the courts already DISMISSED in order > to > > make-up for him cleverly circumventing the rules does not seem > appropriate. > > I opine OVERRULE/NOT GUILTY. > > I don't see how NOT GUILTY is appropriate. I clearly did violate the rule. > > -scshunt > But judgement was already reached on a similar case.