On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> The rule which would invalidate it for missing essential parameters is >> R107, which includes the "lack is correctly identified within one >> week" clause. > > Hm, not exactly. For a Decision to be initiated by R107, both: > (1) The initiator must be authorized to initiate it; > (2) The essential parameters must be included. > > The essential parameters "ratify" if not identified. However, the fact > that the initiator is/isn't authorized to initiate a particular > decision isn't an essential parameter. Since the Promotor isn't > authorized to initiate a decision for a nonexistent proposal, that > part doesn't ratify.
But I (arguably) clearly identified the proposal I was referring to, so it was an attempt to initiate a decision for the correct proposal without (correct) essential parameters, not an imaginary duplicate proposal with AI 1.
