On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 07:46 +0000, Alex Smith wrote: > I intend, without objection, to transfer rule 2166 from the Lost and > Found department to myself. > > (This works because rules fulfil the definition of assets; they exist > only because they're rules-defined (their backing document is rule 2141, > incidentally). They can't be destroyed by announcement even if you own > them due to higher-powered rules saying so; but I see no reason why they > can't be transferred, because rule ownership isn't a substantive aspect > of a rule.)
Sorry, false alarm; I missed the bit where assets have to be defined as assets to actually be assets Still, it'd be interesting to make rules into assets, possibly. I'm not sure what we'd do with them, but it could be interesting. -- ais523
