Tanner Swett wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Ed Murphy<[email protected]> wrote:
Proposal: Okay, that worked once a long time ago
(AI = 1.7)
Amend Rule 2343 (Victory Conditions) by inserting this paragraph after
the second paragraph:
The remainder of this rule notwithstanding, if an event's Victory
Deadline has passed, then a person CANNOT Win the Game due to
that event, and its Victory Deadline CANNOT be extended. An
event's Victory Deadline is initially 28 days after the event,
and CANNOT be extended except as specified by this rule. If it
is within 28 days of passing, then anyone CAN extend it by 28
days by announcement. (Initiating, assigning a judge to, or
judging a judicial case substantially relevant to the event
implicitly counts as such an announcement.)
The last sentence, in parentheses, might not be a great idea. Without
it, we have to say "I extend the deadline" whenever someone calls a
case, which is easy enough; with it, every CFJ that is only marginally
relevant to the event could lead to a second CFJ that is also
marginally relevant to the event, which (in theory) could lead to an
infinite s cascade of CFJs.
Hence the "substantially".
