On 12/20/2011 04:22 PM, John Smith wrote: >> This message is a Delve, satisfying the Goals 2205 and 2338. > > The only Delve was cashing a promise, which relied critically on > 2338. You could have submitted the same judicial arguments even if > Rule 2205 did not exist.
I could have published the same text, but it is not obvious to me that the text would have been judicial arguments in any rule-defined sense without 2205. > (Note that the CfJ's judgment is not a part Delve since it cites > neither rule in its Judge's Arguments; they were clearly cited after > the end of the arguments.) The Delve is the entire series of moves taken in the message in question.
