On 01/26/2012 01:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Just thought of this one, I CFJ on: > If a report that contains a "recent history" section is ratified, it > also ratifies the fact that any missing events pertaining to that > report, that might have otherwise occurred between the earliest and > latest recorded events, did not occur. > > Arguments > Ratification by omission works?
I think that depends on whether the recent history section is a required part of the report or just customarily included alongside it. The judge might want to do a close reading on "a report that contains" to distinguish.
