On 06/09/2012 06:04 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Elliott Hird > <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On 9 June 2012 06:06, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> So, I just realized the rules never took notice of proposal 6671, adopted on >>> March 22, 2010 and affecting Rule 1367. This also means that parts of >>> proposal 6717 were ineffective. >> >> Wait, why doesn't ratification take care of this? >> > > Because the ruleset does not self-ratify; nor can it be ratified > without objection. It is periodically ratified by proposal. > > -scshunt
That's a terrible idea. Of all the things that desperately need periodic ratification....
