On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, omd wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > then the encoding is interpreted as if its plaintext had been > > published at the time the original encoding was published. > > i think this is too vague - what if the plaintext is "I deregister"?
Ah, good point. Hmm, the plaintext should be valid if applied to the actions manipulating the Rules-defined Confidential record, but not otherwise valid. That might be a little tricky to generalize correctly... -G.
