On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 10:43 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > 3. I think instead we should get rid of "hypothetical" win conditions. > Basically, if you can set it up "for real" you should get it, but just > saying "If ABC were true, then it would be undecided" shouldn't be enough.
I don't see what this gains. Allowing hypotheticals lets people test their paradoxes without actually ruining the gamestate, and it should come to the same thing either way. (There are also potential moral issues around paradoxically criminal actions.) -- ais523
