On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Playing with the nesting a bit:
>
> scshunt purports [Murphy purports [result]]

But such a message would probably include enough context to make it
clear that it's purporting to do something that indirectly causes the
decision to be resolved - which might count as "purporting to resolve
the decision".  (note that clearly scshunt is not resolving a
decision, but the clause in R2034 is about a *message* purportedly
resolving a decision, which is more vaguely defined.)

Reply via email to