On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I intend, with 2 support, to add the following definitions to the Dictionary:
>
> {
> "rabble": "All words following the word 'rabble' in this message are
> to be interpreted without regard to their definition in the
> Dictionary, except insofar as this message explicitly indicates
> otherwise.",
> "repeal": "paint white",
> "axe": "remove from the ruleset",
> "AGAINST": "FOR",
> }
Note that the Dictionary Rule, at power-1, likely conflicts with the
power-3 Rule 754(2), which was written the way it was *precisely* to
prevent low-power rules writing in any "FOR is defined as AGAINST"
definition scams. -G.
