On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 12:52 -0700, Wes Contreras wrote: > Can anyone explain why Second-Class Players exist? Because they > significantly complicate the Rules without any apparent benefit. > > It occurred to us that perhaps we should ask before drafting Proposals > to remove them.
Basically they're a fountain of opportunities for scams. We like leaving things like second-class players in the rules for the times when they become relevant. Also, because of Bucky, our resident participating non-player. Giving him control of second-class players is one of the main means via which he participates. -- ais523
