On 4/9/13 10:04 , Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Tanner Swett wrote: >> I submit a proposal with AI 3, titled "This suddenly isn't fun any >> more": Repeal Rule 2380. > > Ah, come on. scshunt can just create a new rule (jump this text). > It also looks like renumbering a rule can be done (can't find a > prohibition against that).
R105 provides no mechanism to change rule ID numbers and prohibits "modifications" to rules by other mechanisms. R2141 defines ID number as a substantive aspect of a rule and also explicitly takes precedence over R105 to allow the Rulekeepor to set the ID number (but not to allow the ID number to be set in other ways). > Probably needs 'with notice' due to > R101 but still. > > What's more of a challenge is coming up with a proposal that can > nix any jump (e.g. "replace any occurrence of scshunt in the > ruleset with...") while not violating R105's "any unambiguity" > clause, but then maybe e'd change eir nickname (and the nickname > in the rule)... and so it goes. Perhaps secure rule changes at power 1.1? - woggle
