On Sun, 14 Apr 2013, omd wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 7386 2.0 Ordinary scshunt Eraser > > FOR. Sorry Bayes, the small positive you contribute isn't worth the > > large negatives brought by the rest of the golems. > > For the record, just the other day I was planning to make a new Bayes > with a (slightly) more sophisticated algorithm, and I think that now > that we're finally allowing drastically unfair voting on ordinary > proposals and a corresponding way to give second-class persons > meaningful voting power,
The most someone can get is just under 3xbase, I'm not sure this really that unfair compared to a lot of past systems? Or am I missing something. -G.
