ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 00:33 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Defendant Rule 2361 informed: 10 Apr 2013 05:42:52 GMT
CFJ: Rule 2361 has been informed of CFJ 3301.
Arguments: Unlike partnerships and golems and the like, which can
reasonably be informed of things via informing the persons capable of
taking control of them, it's not entirely clear whether concepts like
rules and completely emancipated golems can be informed of anything,
being both legal fictions and inanimate objects.
Gratuitous arguments: I think it's reasonable to consider them
informed of anything published during their existence.
(Historical note: Criminal cases originally required the CotC to
inform the defendant of the case, and give them an opportunity to
submit arguments before a judge was assigned. The database still
records this "event" because that's where it stores the identity
of the defendant.)
