isn't that statement paradoxical in nature
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Elliott Hird < [email protected]> wrote: > I object, because AGAINT should never, by definition, be precisely defined. >
- DIS: Re: BUS: Wibster's Max Schutz
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Wibster's Jonathan Rouillard
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Wibster's Max Schutz
