On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:49 PM, woggle <[email protected]> wrote: > I hereby appeal this judgment. > > Arguments: > The message was eventually delivered. Per CFJ 1646 and CFJ 2058, it was sent > when it left my technical domain of control, which was before the deadline. > Even if this precedent does not apply, on its basis, I could have reasonably > believed that my inaction did not violate Rule 2143.
Arguments: Sorry, I didn't remember that CFJ. The precedent (specifically, the part about the time of an action being counted differently for one specific purpose) should not apply, in my opinion, on account of its having no rule basis or argument for why it should be true whatsoever, but it is certainly an argument for DISCHARGE.
