On 27 May 2013, at 04:45, omd <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Fool <[email protected]> wrote: >> Now, am I mistaken that the initiator is also a participant? If so it seems >> you've effectively made em a biased manager. Nothing prevents em and eir >> allies from watching the turn while it's in progress, and it would not be >> detected. > > Indeed... since this is a less severe issue than the initiator > outright faking the votes, which *is* preventable, I was sort of > hoping you could just trust em (that is, currently, me) not to peek. > But if this is cited as an issue by voters against, I will submit a > version that makes the initiator ineligible to vote.
I would prefer the initiator to be ineligible, but it seems unfair to stop you and future Promotors from playing. Maybe have a separate office for initiating Star Chamber decisions which can be rotated fairly often. -- Walker
