On Jun 16, 2013 12:04 PM, "Kerim Aydin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Those "reasonable house rules" are a good way to think of precedent - not > as binding as in the common law, and certainly not algorithmic - but out of > fairness to all players, you generally refer to past decisions if the same > sort of problem comes up again. > > -G. Indeed, this is the civil law model, more or less. -scshunt
