On 6/23/13 19:00 , Fool wrote: >> ########################################################################### >> Quantity: 1 >> Title: !!! >> Text: !!! >> Destruction by author condition: I [omd] CANNOT destroy this promise. >> Cashing condition: This promise has existed for at least two months. >> Author: omd >> Owner: Tree >> ########################################################################### > > So .. how does this work? By CFJ 3334, is the existence of this promise > undecided?
Well, due to my sloppiness in noticing/annotating the doubt w.r.t. that judgement, the promise has since self-ratified into existence. > > I imagine it can be settled by having Horton just destroy the promise without > objection, if it exists. (Also there's a bunch of promises that seem to be > one-off stunts, or refer to things like "Berks" which I take it are obsolete.) Yes; we are due for some more Promise cleanup. As for Berks, "Berks" are the title of that promise. - woggle
