On 26 June 2013 13:03, Fool <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> [Missed one...]
>
> Here I'll just number and repeat the four new proposals that were made.
> You can vote by replying to this message, privately if you like.
> I'll send out a full report shortly.
>
> -Dan
>
> 344 (Yally):
>>
>> Amend Rule 326 to read:
>>
>> Each year on June 30th at 00:04:30 UTC +1200 , the game shall end,
>> and the Voter with the most points shall win. In case of a tie, all
>> such Voters shall win simultaneously. At this time, no game actions
>> may be taken and all timers shall pause. Each year on June 1st at
>> 00:00 UTC the game shall resume and each player shall have eir points
>> set to 0. At this time game actions may again be taken and all timers
>> shall resume.

FOR

> 345 (Blob):
>>
>> I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
>>
>> "If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end
>> of its voting period, that player must immediately forfeit the
>> game."

FOR

> 346 (Blob):
>>
>> I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
>>
>> "Any player who proposes to amend, renumber or repeal rule 311 is
>> deemed to have forfeited the game."

AGAINST

> 347 (Chuck):
>>
>> I propose that Rule 302, or a Rule formerly having had the number
>> 302 (if there is exactly one such rule) be amended to read “Players
>> whose proposals are adopted shall receive 10 points.”

FOR

Reply via email to