On 29/06/2013 4:15 PM, omd wrote:
Amend Rule 2337 (Promises) by appending:A persistent promise is one whose conditions for destruction on cashing is {false}. A revocable promise is one whose set of conditions for author destruction is {true}.
The rest of that rule is phrased for the condition to go the other way: condition for the promise not to be destroyed when cashed.
(Nobody seems to use this condition, I couldn't find an example in Horton's report. So I don't even know what it's usually called.)
