I vote FOR 7522, 7523, 7519, 7516, and 7518. If it is possible to vote on 7517, I vote FOR it. I ENDORSE OMD for 7524. I ENDORSE SCSHUNT for 7525.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:59 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the eligible > voters are the active first-class players at the time of this > distribution, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the valid > options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote). > > Quorum is 7(!). > > Pool report: The Proposal Pool is empty (and no proposals have nonzero > Distributability). > > NUM AI PF C AUTHOR TITLE > > 7516 1.5 0 O G. Badges Badges Badges Badges > 7517 1 0 O Lindar (untitled) > 7518 1.5 0 O Yally Jumping Posture > 7519 3 0 O omd, etc. fixed fixed Gerontocracy fix > 7520 3 0 O omd Grammar fixes > 7521 3 0 O Fool The Office of Harold > 7522 2 0 O Lindar Consistent inconsistency > 7523 3 0 O omd remove dangling judicial declaration > ...... reference > 7524 1 10 O scshunt SLAjflksagksjhyroinwhyfj > 7525 2 0 O omd Public Disagreements > > }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ > > Proposal 7516 (AI=1.5, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by G. > Badges Badges Badges Badges > > Create the following Rule, power-1.5, "Badges": > > A Badge is any patent title with the word 'badge' as part of its > name. A badge SHOULD be used to award multiple persons for > participating in specific event of note within Agora. Any player > CAN award a badge that does not yet exist to three or more persons > simultaneously, with Agoran Consent. The Herald CAN award an > existing badge to persons Without Objection. > > [The last sentence is in case errors are made when a badge is awarded, > Herald can fix]. > > Award the Agora XX Badge to the following persons: > Fool, omd, FSX, Walker, Chuck, ehird, Yally, Michael, scshunt, > Roujo, Murphy, Goethe (G.), Steve, Blob, Tiger, woggle, Ørjan. > > }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ > > Proposal 7517 (AI=1, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by Lindar > (untitled) > > Amend rule 2396 by appending the following paragraph: The official > flavour of Agora is 'bitter'. > > }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ > > Proposal 7518 (AI=1.5, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by Yally > Jumping Posture > > [Adds a new Jumping judicial posture enabling players to decide how often > they want to receive cases.] > > > Amend the section of Rule 1871 which reads: > > * Standing. Standing players are generally qualified to judge. > > > to read: > > * Jumping. Jumping players are generally qualified to judge. > > * Standing. Standing players are generally qualified to judge if there are > no well qualified jumping players. > > > and the section which reads: > > A player CAN flip eir posture to any non-standing value by announcement. > > When the CotC assigns a player as judge, that player becomes sitting. > > The CotC CAN rotate the bench (change all sitting players to standing) by > announcement, but SHALL NOT do so unless, of the judicial cases requiring > assignment: > > > to read: > > A player CAN flip eir posture to any value, except standing or jumping, by > announcement. > > When the CotC assigns a player as judge, that player becomes standing if e > was previously jumping and sitting if e was previously standing. > > Aspiration is a player switch with the same values as Posture, and default > value standing. A player CAN flip eir Aspiration to any value by > announcement. The CotC CAN rotate the bench (change the Posture of all > sitting players to their Aspiration values) by announcement, but SHALL NOT > do so unless, of the judicial cases requiring assignment: > > }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ > > Proposal 7519 (AI=3, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by omd, Walker > fixed fixed Gerontocracy fix > > Amend Rule 2357 by replacing: > > During the 32 days after a Gerontocracy is declared: > > with: > > A Gerontocracy ends 32 days after it is declared, unless it is > brought to an end early. Ending a Gerontocracy early is secured. > During a Gerontocracy: > > and by appending: > > * Any Elder CAN end the Gerontocracy early without three Elder > objections. > > and by replacing: > > An Elder can declare a Gerontocracy with 3 Elder support, unless > a Gerontocracy was declared within the preceding 28 days. > > with: > > An Elder can declare a Gerontocracy with 3 Elder support, unless > a Gerontocracy was declared within the preceding 28 days and has > not ended. > > As of the adoption of this proposal, any ongoing Gerontocracy is > brought to an end. > > }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ > > Proposal 7520 (AI=3, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by omd > Grammar fixes > > Amend Rule 217 (Interpreting the Rules) by replacing: > > Differences in spelling, grammar, capitalization, whitespace, > dialect, or the use of synonyms or abbreviations > > with: > > Differences in spelling, grammar, capitalization, whitespace, > or dialect, and uses of synonyms or abbreviations > > Amend the Rule enacted by Proposal 7490 (Funcentives) by replacing: > > Players SHALL NOT discuss eir votes > > with: > > Players SHALL NOT discuss their votes > > }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ > > Proposal 7521 (AI=3, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by Fool > The Office of Harold > > Amend rules 649 (Patent Titles), 2343 (Victory Conditions), and 1367 > (Degrees), by replacing all occurrences of "Herald" or "herald" with > "Harold". > > [ Maybe it was only a spelling error, but it's a really good error. ] > > }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ > > Proposal 7522 (AI=2, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by Lindar > Consistent inconsistency > > Amend Rule 2410 (Parties) and Rule 2413 (General Elections) by > replacing "Returning Officer" with "Returning Officor". > > }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ > > Proposal 7523 (AI=3, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by omd > remove dangling judicial declaration reference > > Amend Rule 2170 (Who Am I?) by replacing: > > (Upon a judicial finding that the Executor of a public > message cannot otherwise be determined within reasonable effort, > the judge SHALL in a timely fashion publish a judicial > declaration specifying the identity of that message's Executor.) > > with: > > (Upon a judicial finding that the Executor of a public > message cannot otherwise be determined within reasonable effort, > the judge SHOULD attempt to ratify a document specifying eir > identity.) > > }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ > > Proposal 7524 (AI=1, PF=Y10, Ordinary) by scshunt > SLAjflksagksjhyroinwhyfj > > Amend Rule 2138 by removing ", and eir party". > > }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ > > Proposal 7525 (AI=2, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by omd > Public Disagreements > > Retitle Rule 2328 (Public Agreements) to "Public Disagreements", and > amend it by replacing "agreement" with "disagreement".
