Lindar Greenwood wrote:
I announce a CFJ on the following text:
{ Announcing in Agora-Business the creation of a promise that, upon
being cashed, causes the player cashing said promise to break a rule,
does not cause the creator of said promise to violate R2394, nor does
it cause the creator of said promise to violate R2394 upon the cashing
of said promise. }
Rule 2394/0 (Power=1)
Crime by Proxy
Being the Executor of a message in which another person commits
the Class-N Crime of X (for any values of N and X) is the
Class-N Crime of X By Proxy
Gratuitous: FALSE on a technicality. A player could create a promise
whose cashing caused em to violate R2394, then cash it emselves.
At first, I thought this was addressing the reverse: if Alice cashes a
proposal that causes Bob to Taunt the Police, then Alice is guilty of
Naughtiness by Proxy (but should generally get a sentence of DISCHARGE).
